Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 734 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-12700F - 196 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £249.12 vs £489.99
- Up to 46% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900F - £1.36 vs £2.5 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for £489.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
183
93%
Value, £/FPS
£1.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£249.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £249.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4362 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |