Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3507 days newer than Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4690K - 216 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £481.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67317 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
1287
42.615894039735096%
Multi-Core
3631
19.874110563765736%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 88 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |