Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 264% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-3330 - 193 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £59.99 vs £489.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i9-14900F - £1.13 vs £2.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
193
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.54/FPS
44%
Price, £
£489.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for £489.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10078 minutes ago
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |