Buy on Amazon
£549.98
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1510 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 19% better in Escape From Tarkov than Athlon 3000G - 236 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - £51.44 vs £549.98
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
236
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£549.98
9%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-14900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) up to 5.8 GHz
Buy for £549.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
AMD Athlon 3000G Processor with Radeon Vega 3 Graphics (2C/4T, 3.5 GHz Base Clock)
Buy for £51.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
32.484725050916495%
Multi-Core
1975
12.450356174746265%
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
