Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3502 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 35% better in Remnant II than FX-9590 - 107 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 150 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £141.0 vs £529.98
- Up to 64% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-13900KS - £1.78 vs £4.95 per FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
107
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.95/FPS
35.95959595959596%
Price, £
£529.98
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £529.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1638 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
79
73.83177570093457%
Value, £/FPS
£1.78/FPS
100%
Price, £
£141
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £141 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1638 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 220 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |