Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i5-14400 - 167 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £219.97 vs £465.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-13900KF - £1.37 vs £2.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.79/FPS
49%
Price, £
£465.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
161
96%
Value, £/FPS
£1.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£219.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £219.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |