Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1037 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 150 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - £464.99 vs £1250.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - £3.1 vs £9.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 48 vs 32 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£464.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £464.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Buy for £1,250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 48 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |