Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2600X - 263 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £187.33 vs £451.82
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £451.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75465 minutes ago
Buy for £187.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
41.59381304640215%
Multi-Core
5263
26.121699424260473%
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |