Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-13700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F and Core i7-13700 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-13700 - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700 - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
166
99%
Value, £/FPS
£2.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£402.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £402.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |