Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3869 days newer than Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 16% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-3470T - 148 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i5-3470T
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470T
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
20.695970695970693%
Multi-Core
1135
6.5915558394796445%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-3470T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
