Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2682 days newer than Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 36% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-6300 - 732 vs 540 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
46.227106227106226%
Multi-Core
2539
14.745339450606886%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
