Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3775 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 55% better in New World than Core i3-3240 - 153 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
20.293040293040292%
Multi-Core
1137
6.6031709158487715%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
