Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1952 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 46% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 249 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
42.78388278388278%
Multi-Core
5794
33.648876241361286%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
