Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3725 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 122% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than FX-8350 - 151 vs 68 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
