Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2713 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700K - 157 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - £117.88 vs £563.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900 - £0.89 vs £3.59 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £563.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
133
84%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£117.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £117.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |