Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1988 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 167 vs 157 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 145 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 44 vs 24 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
43.64784546805349%
Multi-Core
9619
59.292362694939285%
Intel Core i9-12900KS | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 16 | Cores | 22 |
| 24 | Threads | 44 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
