Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 705 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10500.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-10500 - 157 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10500 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - £179.99 vs £482.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-12900KS - £1.38 vs £3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.08/FPS
44%
Price, £
£482.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for £482.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
130
82%
Value, £/FPS
£1.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£179.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |