Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1173 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 11% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-9600K - 202 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - £156.66 vs £319.52
- Up to 46% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-12900F - £0.86 vs £1.58 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
202
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.58/FPS
54.43037974683544%
Price, £
£319.52
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for £319.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
182
90.0990099009901%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£156.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £156.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1712
67.42812130760142%
Multi-Core
6468
46.5658747300216%
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |