Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 2956 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1820 - 295 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - £5.99 vs £291.94
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £291.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77142 minutes ago
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
19.338322174084286%
Multi-Core
825
5.939524838012959%
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |