Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 29% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 244 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
244
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.06/FPS
100%
Price, £
£258.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |