Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £262.99 vs £519.36
- Up to 42% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-14900F - £0.39 vs £0.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-11900K - 773 vs 683 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
683
88%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£262.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £262.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
773
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.67/FPS
58%
Price, £
£519.36
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for £519.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |