Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 693 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than Core i7-9700F - 240 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - £189.99 vs £262.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-11900K - £0.94 vs £1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
240
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
85%
Price, £
£262.99
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for £262.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
202
84%
Value, £/FPS
£0.94/FPS
100%
Price, £
£189.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |