Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Remnant II than Core i5-12400F - 98 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - £109.98 vs £258.88
- Up to 56% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-11900K - £1.15 vs £2.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
98
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.64/FPS
43%
Price, £
£258.88
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for £258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
96
97%
Value, £/FPS
£1.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£109.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £109.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |