Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 2330 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-4670K - 180 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - £71.18 vs £1150.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10980XE - £0.41 vs £6.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 84 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
173
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£71.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £71.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 4 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |