Buy on Amazon
£778.38
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 614 days newer than Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 2400G - 153 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-10940X Desktop Processor 14 Cores up to 4.8GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W, BX8069510940X
Buy for £778.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 279 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor with Radeon Vega 11 Graphics - Wraith Stealth Cooler - YD2400C5FBBOX
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
67.66965428937259%
Multi-Core
3294
30.587798309963787%
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
