Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 194 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 0% better in Rocket League than Core i7-10700F - 730 vs 727 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - £218.88 vs £764.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-10920X - £0.3 vs £1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
730
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.05/FPS
28%
Price, £
£764.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for £764.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18765 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
727
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |