Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 808 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10920X - 238 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - £113.97 vs £764.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10920X - £0.48 vs £3.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £764.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17540 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
238
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£113.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £113.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17539 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |