Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 72% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1820 - 414 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £5.99 vs £270.0
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76906 minutes ago
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
27.850255246738513%
Multi-Core
825
9.01245357220887%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |