Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 75 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 237 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £270.0 vs £835.82
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75650 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
236
99.57805907172997%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£835.82
32%
Buy for £835.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75650 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
95.06522972206466%
Multi-Core
12353
100%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |