Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Ryzen 5 3600X - 207 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £243.53 vs £264.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10900KF - £1.19 vs £1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £264 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
205
99%
Value, £/FPS
£1.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£243.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £243.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |