Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1213 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-7350K - 138 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 60 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1452
83.01886792452831%
Multi-Core
2873
31.3543599257885%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
