Buy on Amazon
£249.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 320 days older than Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i3-10105 - 203 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 66% better value when playing Control than Core i9-10900F - £0.42 vs £1.23 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.23/FPS
34%
Price, £
£249.99
100%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
