Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 75 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £248.65 vs £1179.39
- Up to 79% better value when playing Watch Dogs: Legion than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £1.7 vs £8.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.7/FPS
100%
Price, £
£248.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £248.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£8.08/FPS
21%
Price, £
£1179.39
21%
Buy for £1,179.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |