Buy on Amazon
£325
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1799
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 626 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 260 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 64 vs 20 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£325
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Single-Core
1180
70.40572792362768%
Multi-Core
7221
85.69902682174224%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 32 |
| 20 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
