Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 82 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 246 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £247.07 vs £399.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900F - £1.01 vs £1.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.63/FPS
61.96319018404909%
Price, £
£399.99
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1664 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
244
99.1869918699187%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£247.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £247.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1664 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Single-Core
1552
92.60143198090692%
Multi-Core
6173
73.2613339662948%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |