Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1348 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-10900 - 134 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £108.97 vs £276.12
- Up to 63% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900 - £0.81 vs £2.21 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £276.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £108.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |