Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 1200 - 543 vs 520 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £175.0 vs £677.57
- Up to 73% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-10900 - £0.34 vs £1.25 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
543
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.25/FPS
27%
Price, £
£677.57
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for £677.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |