Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i7-9750HF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 562 days newer than Core i7-9750HF.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9750HF
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9750HF - 121 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9750HF - 24 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£197
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £197 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9750HF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |