Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than Core i5-10400F - 730 vs 718 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - £101.31 vs £379.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-9700KF - £0.14 vs £0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 12 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
730
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.52/FPS
26%
Price, £
£379.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £379.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
718
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £101.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |