Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10300 - 112 vs 110 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - £170.99 vs £379.99
- Up to 54% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9700KF - £1.55 vs £3.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.39/FPS
45%
Price, £
£379.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for £379.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
110
98%
Value, £/FPS
£1.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£170.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £170.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |