Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 693 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - £189.99 vs £237.41
- Up to 10% better value when playing New World than Core i5-11600 - £1.61 vs £1.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 13% better in New World than Core i7-9700F - 133 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
118
88%
Value, £/FPS
£1.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£189.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
133
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.79/FPS
89%
Price, £
£237.41
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for £237.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |