Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 448 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £328.66 vs £2378.05
- Up to 86% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £1.35 vs £9.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-9700F - 245 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 64 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
244
99.59183673469387%
Value, £/FPS
£1.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£328.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £328.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2487 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
245
100%
Value, £/FPS
£9.71/FPS
13.903192584963955%
Price, £
£2378.05
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2487 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1549
93.595166163142%
Multi-Core
6256
42.91103642225118%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |