Buy on Amazon
£188.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 621 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 792 vs 751 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel® Core™ i7-9700F Processor 12M Cache, up to 4.70 GHz
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75503 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
75.59715945771465%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
