Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 1600X - 271 vs 258 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - £178.58 vs £346.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-9700F - £0.69 vs £1.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £346 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
258
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |