Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4350 - 178 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - £59.97 vs £346.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-9700F - £0.4 vs £1.94 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £346 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |