Buy on Amazon
£258.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than FX-4350 - 123 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - £59.97 vs £258.66
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel® Core™ i7-9700F Processor 12M Cache, up to 4.70 GHz
Buy for £258.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
