Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2282 days newer than Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-950 - 298 vs 296 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
