Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2639 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-940XM - 121 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 24 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |