Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1837 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-940XM - 120 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
120
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£80.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £80.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |