Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 4192 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 22% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-920XM - 285 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£261.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £261.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3378 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |