Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 4602 days newer than Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 47% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-880 - 160 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
18.426647767540754%
Multi-Core
1653
9.457062761027519%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
